Supreme Court E-Library
Information At Your Fingertips

  View printer friendly version

WHEREAS, Secs. 29, 31 and 34, Art. IV of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9266 (The Architecture Act of 2006) state:

“SEC. 29. Prohibition in the Practice of Architecture and Penal Clause - Any person who shall practice or offer to practice architecture in the Philippines without being registered/licensed and who are not holders of temporary or special permits in accordance with the provisions of this Act, x x x x or any person who shall use in connection with his/her name or otherwise assume, use or advertise any title or description tending to convey the impression that he/she is an architect when he/she is not an architect, or any person whether Filipino or foreigner, who knowingly allows the use, adoption, implementation of plans, designs or specifications made by any person, firm, partnership or company not duly licensed to engage in the practice of architecture, or any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this Act, its implementing rules and regulations, the Code of Ethical Conduct and Standards of Professional Practice, or any policy of the Board and the Commission, shall be guilty of misdemeanor and charged in court by the Commission and shall, upon conviction be sentenced to a fine of not less than One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) but not more than Five million pesos (P5,000,000.00) or to suffer imprisonment for a period not less than six (6) months or not exceeding six (6) years, or both, at the discretion of the Court.

SEC 31. Liability of Representatives of Non-Registered Persons - It shall be unlawful for any person or firm or corporation to seek to avoid the provisions of this Act by having a representative or employee seek architectural work in their behalf, unless and until, such persons have duly qualified and are duly registered/licensed, otherwise, both those represented and the representative, the employer and the employee shall be deemed guilty of violation of this Act. Solicitation of architectural work shall be construed as offering to practice architecture and shall be unlawful for any non-registered and unlicensed persons to do so.

SEC. 34. Non-Registered Person Shall Not Claim Equivalent Service - Persons not registered as an architect shall not claim nor represent either services or work as equivalent to those of a duly qualified registered architect, or that they are qualified for any branch or function of architectural practice, even though no form of the title “Architect” is used. (emphasis supplied)

WHEREAS, similar provisions are found in the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of R.A. No. 9266, in effect since 01 December 2004;

WHEREAS, the general public is deliberately misled or confused as to the real professional status of certain entities (natural and juridical), claiming or projecting themselves to be either registered and licensed architects (RLAs) or of being RLAs in group practice, when they are in fact not registered and licensed to practice architecture or other professions considered allied to architecture;

WHEREAS, the Board has confirmed that these entities are able to offer and actually practice architecture either through RLAs who aid and abet such practices or through the technical assistance being rendered by B.S. Architecture students, graduates/graduates undergoing diversified training, and unsuccessful examinees who have taken the architecture licensure examinations (ALE);

WHEREAS, there are already sufficient processes and safeguards to address the RLAs who aid and abet such practices and who directly violate R.A. No. 9266, but that there are insufficient ones to address the second set of violators who are non-RLAs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board is hereby RESOLVES, as it is hereby RESOLVED, that non-RLAs such as arts and trades school students and graduates trained in architectural drafting, B.S. Architecture students, graduates/graduates undergoing diversified training and unsuccessful examinees who have taken the ALE, must undertake or perform works of architecture, falling within the scope of practice of architecture, as defined under Secs. 3.(3) and 3.(4), Article I, of R.A. No. 9266, only for RLAs (with valid certificates of registration and valid professional identification card), for qualified firms of RLAs (which have valid registration/s with the PRC), for foreign architects (with valid special/temporary permits issued by the Board and PRC) and the like;

FURTHER, RESOLVED, That the following terms as above-mentioned are hereby defined:

1) “arts and trades school students and graduates trained in architectural drafting”, as entities enrolled or who have been enrolled in architectural drafting courses (manual or electronic);

2) “B.S. Architecture student”, as entities enrolled or who have been enrolled in courses forming part of the CHED-recognized curriculum for a B.S. Architecture degree;

3) “B.S. Architecture graduates”, as entities who have satisfactorily completed all courses forming part of the CHED-recognized curriculum for a B.S. Architecture degree; under this definition are entities who go on to enroll in graduate/post-graduate courses in architecture or other fields (masters or doctoral) in the Philippines or overseas, without first completing the mandatory two (2) - year diversified training prior to taking the Architecture Licensure Examinations (ALE);

4) “B.S. Architecture graduates undergoing diversified training”, as entities who have satisfactorily completed all courses forming part of the CHED-recognized curriculum for a B.S. Architecture degree and are in the process of completing the mandatory two (2) - year diversified training prior to taking the Architecture Licensure Examinations (ALE);

5) “unsuccessful examinees who have taken the Architecture Licensure Examinations (ALE)”, as entities have taken and failed the ALE and who are employed by RLAs and by non-RLAs alike; and

6) “works of architecture”, as any form of work or component of work of architectural deliverables/outputs that fall within the recognized scope of professional architectural practice that are within the ambit of definitions supplied under Secs. 3.(3) and 3.(4), Article I, of R.A. No. 9266 and its pertinent IRR.

FURTHERMORE, RESOLVED, that the act of non-RLAs performing works of architecture, such as those done by arts and trades school students and graduates trained in architectural drafting, B.S. Architecture students, graduates/graduates undergoing diversified training and unsuccessful examinees who have taken the ALE for other non-RLAs, whether wittingly or unwittingly, shall be deemed a willful violation of Secs, 29, 31 and 34, Article IV, of R.A. No. 9266 and its pertinent IRR provisions, and shall therefore be criminally charged with the illegal practice of architecture and/or with the applicable violation/s of R.A. No. 9266 and its IRR, subject to the appropriate penalties provided thereunder.

MOREOVER, RESOLVED, that all schools of architecture in the Philippines shall prominently display this Resolution, once approved and published, within its premises for the information of B.S. Architecture students, graduates/graduates undergoing diversified training and their prospective recruiters/employers; and

FINALLY, RESOLVED, that the chapters of the integrated and accredited organization of architects (IAPOA) take steps to identify and officially inform all arts and trades schools offering architectural drafting courses within their respective jurisdictions of this Resolution, once approved and published, and to cause its posting within such premises for the information of their students, graduates, and their prospective recruiters/employers; and

That the IAPOA also takes steps to disseminate this information to its student and graduate auxiliary organizations and to its membership in general.

This Resolution shall take effect after fifteen (15) days following the full and complete publication thereof in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines.

Adopted: 16 Jan. 2008

(SGD.) ARMANDO N. ALLI Chairman
(SGD.) ANGELINE T. CHUA CHIACO Member	(SGD.) MARIETTA B. SEGOVIA Member
ATTESTED TO:
(SGD.) CARLOS G. ALMELOR Secretary, Professional Regulatory Boards
APPROVED:
(SGD.) LEONOR TRIPON-ROSERO Chairperson
(SGD.) RUTH RAÑA- PADILLA Commissioner	(SGD.) NILO L. ROSAS Commissioner