Supreme Court E-Library
Information At Your Fingertips


  View printer friendly version

(NAR) VOL. 15 NOS. 1-2 / JANUARY - MARCH 2004

[ PHIC PHILHEALTH CIRCULAR NO. 01, S. 2004, January 12, 2004 ]

GUIDELINES ON REFERRAL OF COMPLICATED CLAIMS TO THE PEER REVIEW COMMITTEE



As part of its mandate to implement a quality assurance program to ensure that its accredited health care providers follow accepted norms of medical practice, the Corporation established the Peer Review Committee (PeRC) under the Quality Assurance, Research & Policy Development Group (QARPDG).  The PeRC is composed of representatives from Professional Regulation Commission, Philippine Hospital Association, Philippine Medical Association, Philippine College of Physicians, Philippine College of Surgeons, Philippine Society of Anesthesiologists, Philippine Obstetrical and Gynecological Society, Philippine Pediatric Society, Philippine Academy of Opthalmology, Philippine Academy of Family Physicians, and the Corporation.  It was established by the PhilHealth Board on 20 June 2002 to resolve issues involving quality of practice and promote quality assurance in the local health care setting.

Consistent with its mandate and in order to ensure that the Corporation pays only for services and resources that are appropriate and necessary in the delivery of quality health care services to its members, the following guidelines on referral of complicated claims to the Peer Review Committee are hereby prescribed:

1.         Referring Offices

Offices that may refer claims to the PeRC shall be the PhilHealth Regional Offices, NCR Claims Department, Protests and Appeals Review Department (PARD) and the Claims Review Office (CRO).

2.         Claims Covered

Claims that may be referred to the PeRC shall include those involving problems/questions on the following issues/concerns:
 
2.1 appropriateness of utilization of drugs, supplies and diagnostic procedures;
  
2.2 interpretation/application of the clinical practice guidelines adopted by PHIC as guides to good practice;
  
2.3 emergency nature of cases, especially those attended by non-accredited providers, admitted for less than 24 hours, or served beyond accredited capability, e.g., primary hospital admitting a catastrophic case or performing a procedure with an RVU greater than 30;
  
2.4 case typing and compensability of certain illnesses and procedures; and
  
2.5 appropriateness of surgical procedure done.

Claims not involving that above issues but still referred to PeRC shall be returned to the referring office without action.

The Claims Division of the PRO's and Claims Department of NCR shall remain as the proper offices to handle requests for adjustment of payment.  However, if there are still unresolved issues included in item #2, such claims may be referred to PeRC together with documentary requirements enumerated in item #3.  If the claim was returned to the hospital or member (for directly filed claims), and the same was re-filed without complying with the request for justification/explanation and other documentary requirements, the evaluating office shall decide on the merits of the claim based on the available information.  If the hospital or member appeals such a decision, the appeal shall be lodged with the CRO. Only if the CRO could not decide after evaluating the justification/explanation and other pertinent documents shall the claim be referred to PeRC after compliance with documentary requirements.

3.         Documentary Requirements

In referring claims, the following documents shall be submitted to QARPDG:
 
3.1 transmittal letter using the form in Annex A<SUP STYLE="COLOR: RGB(255, 0, 0);">*</SUP>
3.2 photocopy of PhilHealth Forms 2 and 3 (as applicable)
3.3 photocopy of clinical chart
3.4 photocopy of operative, delivery, and/or anesthesia records, as applicable
3.5 justification/explanation of the attending physician on his management or assigned case type or on why the case should be considered emergency.
3.6 other pertinent document(s) as necessary; e.g., explanation from member

The referring office shall be responsible in preparing the above documents and/or securing them from the appropriate parties.  Providers and/or members should immediately comply with the request from the referring office to submit such documents in order to facilitate the referral.  Upon receipt of the above documents, the referring office shall re-evaluate the claims taking into account the data and information contained in such documents.  It shall refer to PeRC such claims only when no decision can be made based on such evaluation.  The original claims must not be submitted to QARPDG.

Referrals with incomplete requirements shall be returned without action.

4.         Processing Period

The PeRC shall act on referrals within 60 days from receipt of complete documents. QARPDG shall inform the hospital or member that his/her claim has been submitted to PeRC for deliberation within 15 days from receipt thereof (Annexes B* and C*, respectively).

5.         PeRC Action

The PeRC shall act on the referral accoding to the following matrix:
 
Nature of Referral
PeRC Action
   
Questions on appropriateness of utilization of drugs, supplies and diagnostic procedures Identify trends of utilization (whether appropriate or inappropriate) which shall be the bases of approval or denial of payment by the referring office
   
Questions on the proper interpretation/application of the clinical practice guidelines adopted by PHIC as guides to good practice Provide intepretation of clinical practice guidelines
   
Questionable emergency nature of cases Determine whether the case is emergency or not
   
Questions on case typing and compensability of certain illnesses and procedures Determine appropriate case type (whether ordinary, intensive, or catastrophic) and compensability of illnesses and procedures
Questions on appropriateness of surgical procedure done procedure Determine appropriateness of surgical

 

  
The final decision on payment remains with the referring office as there are other factors considered in claims payment.

6.         Effectivity

This Circular shall take effect immediately.

Adopted: 12 Jan. 2004


(SGD.) FRANCISCO T. DUQUE, M.D., M.Sc.
President and C.E.O.




* Text Available at Office of the National Administrative Register, U.P. Law Complex, Diliman, Quezon City.

* Text Available at Office of the National Administrative Register, U.P. Law Complex, Diliman, Quezon City.
© Supreme Court E-Library 2019
This website was designed and developed, and is maintained, by the E-Library Technical Staff in collaboration with the Management Information Systems Office.